Jump to content


Photo

Announcer 3vs3, 5vs5, RBG. Vote Poll.


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

Poll: Announcer 3vs3, 5vs5, RBG. Vote Poll. (82 member(s) have cast votes)

Should we have 3vs3, 5vs5 announcers?

  1. 1.Yes, but i have my own vision about it. (3 votes [2.68%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.68%

  2. 2.Yes, It should be announced every 5 minutes when any team joins the queue (42 votes [37.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 37.50%

  3. 3.Yes, It should be announced every 10+ minutes when any team joins the queue (13 votes [11.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.61%

  4. 4.Yes, It should be just a simple promotion regardless of actuall queue status. (6 votes [5.36%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.36%

  5. 5.Yes, It should be announced on the website. (6 votes [5.36%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.36%

  6. 6.Yes, It should be announced only on custom announcer channel. (21 votes [18.75%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.75%

  7. 7.No, This is a bad idea. (7 votes [6.25%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  8. 8.Add .queuestatus command (14 votes [12.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

Freedom for Koko?

  1. Yes. Koko did nothing wrong. (38 votes [46.34%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 46.34%

  2. Yes. Freedom or riot. (44 votes [53.66%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 53.66%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Kadi2

Kadi2

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 188 posts

Posted 12 March 2016 - 02:21 PM

Previous topic with your thoughts: http://community.atl...erver-announce/

#2 blinkmasterx

blinkmasterx

    Nobility

  • Members
  • 383 posts

Posted 12 March 2016 - 02:44 PM

i think using both 2 and 6 option would be best but only with server announcment about such channel ( no flooding for ppl not interested )


Stream channel:

 

http://www.youtube.c...qPlcBOWLvw/live

 

 


#3 Lorelya

Lorelya

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 229 posts

Posted 12 March 2016 - 02:49 PM

Which one of the No answers to the "freedom for koko" question is a yes?

#KOKODIDNOTHINGWRONG


  • Artim likes this

Abusive Behaviour : Pula sarkazmu na ten miesiąc wyczerpana

http://atlantiss.eu/...95594#view-page

 

Proud member of "Can't say autism without ATS"


#4 Riverwin

Riverwin

    Gentry

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 12 March 2016 - 03:24 PM

#FREEKOKO
  • koko123 likes this

#5 Kadi2

Kadi2

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 188 posts

Posted 12 March 2016 - 04:35 PM

i think using both 2 and 6 option would be best but only with server announcment about such channel ( no flooding for ppl not interested )

If you think about it deeply, without any queue announcer players have to spam all the channels in both factions to announce it manually.



#6 blinkmasterx

blinkmasterx

    Nobility

  • Members
  • 383 posts

Posted 12 March 2016 - 05:10 PM

Nah u did not understand me. I mean theres custom joint faction Channel like 3v3 where system announces ppl are in que. U cant write in this chat. U need to manualy join such chat to see announces. But beside this every 30 mins theres server announce to every1 that such Channel exists

Stream channel:

 

http://www.youtube.c...qPlcBOWLvw/live

 

 


#7 Kadi2

Kadi2

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 188 posts

Posted 25 March 2016 - 08:50 AM

Nah u did not understand me. I mean theres custom joint faction Channel like 3v3 where system announces ppl are in que. U cant write in this chat. U need to manualy join such chat to see announces. But beside this every 30 mins theres server announce to every1 that such Channel exists



Oh ok. #SNEAKYBUMP

#8 Nohir

Nohir

    Commoner

  • Members
  • 27 posts

Posted 27 March 2016 - 02:34 AM

 --- Soo, any news about this? (even if this is gonna drift form Blizzlike ? )


And Bla Bla Bla. . .


#9 Justaforumguy

Justaforumguy

    Commoner

  • Members
  • 49 posts

Posted 27 March 2016 - 03:37 AM

Who the fuck is Koko?
I wanted to vote but I can't vote because of this immature shit.


  • xtl, jedi and Cleo94 like this

#10 Kadi2

Kadi2

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 188 posts

Posted 27 March 2016 - 12:18 PM

 --- Soo, any news about this? (even if this is gonna drift form Blizzlike ? )

 

This is not blizzlike feature, for most players it doesn't invade the blizzlike rules that much. A single member of atlantiss staff won't even inform us about their statement since decisions like this should be consulted. I just made the poll, since player's opinion might help them in making the decision. But seeing the low amount of voters. I don't think they will take that poll into consideration.



#11 Kadi2

Kadi2

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 188 posts

Posted 30 April 2016 - 08:15 PM

bump



#12 Matiwo12

Matiwo12

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:34 PM

BUMP



#13 Champk

Champk

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 115 posts

Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:36 PM

3s announcer would be juicy.



#14 Lickety

Lickety

    Gentry

  • Members
  • 54 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 10:18 AM

On my last server it was implemented and it worked great. But here since 2s are constant I think only for 3s it would make sense. Since it makes dodging alot easier.


Lickety Shuken


#15 champawat

champawat

    Commoner

  • Members
  • 22 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 11:05 AM

personally I think that 3s solo que would be the best for that under-populated server. I was playing at server where that feature was enabled and it was my main entertainment. It could encourage people to play normal 3s.
  • Genome and Brzydal87 like this

#16 Slly

Slly

    Commoner

  • New Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 11:23 AM

I like the ideas. But surely we could set up some " 3's days " among ourselves? 

To start we could aim for a day in the mid of the week, and one in the weekend. I don't know what the main raiding days are but if we could avoid those that be great.

 

And not just for the arena heroes, but for everyone. Would be great to see 8-10 different teams queuing. Cause Ive been speaking to a lot of people, and it looks like a lot of people are game, there is just no one to organize stuff. We need Kaspi for 3's.

 

And if the announcer doesnt go live, could we maybe drop everyone in a skype group, and call out if anyone's is playing. 

 

Just ideas to get the 3s bracket more alive. 


Druid extraordinair.


#17 Champk

Champk

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 115 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 01:23 PM

Sadly they will never implement 3s soloq, or even dampening to 2s.



#18 kevinoplolxd1

kevinoplolxd1

    Commoner

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 05:54 PM

Sadly they will never implement 3s soloq, or even dampening to 2s.

Would be nice :( ! I love solo q it would increase the 3vs3 activity of the whole server.

 

On arena tournament was even with 100 players on cata a higher 3s activity like here on atlantis :) and on a server with 2k players Online would be just awsome and a pvp paridise.

 

I played a lot of soloque on arena tournament to improve my skills and a lose doesnt feel bad because no one taked soloque serious .The Server stuff should really think about it. I´m sure  a lot of Player would join this server because of Soloque.

 

The 3s Announcer is a good step forward. If the stuff have any questions about soloque,  I´m open to answer them.


youtube.com/gottzx


#19 Matiwo12

Matiwo12

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 06:32 PM

Well, thats true. Solo q would make atlantiss a pvp paradise. It also could be used on the upcoming TBC server. And honestly, it doesnt interfere with blizzlike policy that much. It just makes the game a lot better. Apart from that, the topic is about announcer :P



#20 Ireneadler

Ireneadler

    Aristocracy

  • Members
  • 232 posts

Posted 14 December 2016 - 07:34 PM

or even dampening to 2s.

XDD 


  • blinkmasterx and koko123 like this

28bcy14.jpg

sytuacja jest na tyle poważna, że część graczy pvp - tych którzy tak naprawdę najwięcej grają - poważnie myśli o zmianie serwera..





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users